Achilles Rupture Recovery

d3 / MRI and clinic visit

Imaging proves tricky but worthwhile / specialist clinic is excellent

A worthwhile MRI / specialist foot & ankle clinic

(22nd Oct 2025 – 14 mins read)

< re-structuring work-in-progress – Feb 12th 2026 >

TL;DR:
– how important is an MRI?
– is an ultrasound sufficient?
– do you even need that ?

First things first!

J:

  • ? V
  • ?

My personal “Day Three”

The MRI visit was initially problematical, because the three young ladies performing the MRI were trying to insist that I had to put my foot into the ‘neutral’ position … for me, it was bad enough taking off the boot (my brain screaming, “DANGER! DANGER!”) nevermind going from 30 degrees (Ed: it’s called ‘plantar flexion‘, like a ballet dancer) to zero. My brain said no; the pain said, “NOOOO!”. With getting on for 10 mins of inching this way and that, we found a handleable kind of compromise 20-ish degree position allowing them to mount the coils relatively tightly around the ankle/foot necessary to get a good magnetic signal to ensure picture quality was ok … and it worked fine.

A short while later, the MRI team gave me a letter with access codes so that one could download / view the image series. Then it was off back to the clinic in Munich, presenting myself via the walk-in ER for a third doctor to look at me, as instructed the day before. As I took off the shoe, the stink hit me … badly 🤮 . Disgusting and embarassing. Still, the doc said, par for the course with it on 24/7; it hadn’t helped going from a climbing shoe after a 2 hour session directly into the boot without a shower!

A thorough exam including yet another ultrasound followed; we talked, then he consulted the senior foot surgeon and she gave me the green light for a non-operative treatment (which I’d been hoping for). In fact, my tear was relatively high up, I was told (about 9cm from ‘insertion’ at the heel, close to the muscle), meaning an op would be more complicated than a ‘simple’ tendon-to-tendon thing towards the centre of the tendon with a ‘minimal invasive’ op being out of the question -> they would have to really cut me open -> ‘the scales’ swung further in favour of non-operative treatment.

This was also encouraging: I had googled enough to know the trend over the last 10-20 years has been increasingly (albeit slowly) towards non-operative treatment, also with complete ruptures; with healing times as well as functional outcomes being comparable, but obviously none of the infection / other complication risks associated with surgery, I was hoping for this diagnosis (more details to this stuff later … but it is amazing how many cases there are where even gaps of 3cm are bridged by the body to lead to return of full functionality; note: good / consistent physio is super important!).

Note: this is NOT to say I am against operative treatment … if at least 2 doctors had given me – independently – the advice to have my injury operated on, with a solid basis, I would have gone down that path.

What I was also given was a written report and (unfortunately a non-VACOped specific) rehab protocol: I should be 10kg weight bearing from the start once in the shoe; this should be ramped up, depending upon subjective pain (WBAT = Weight Bearing As Tolerated, i.e. not pushing beyond about 2/10 pain, certainly no sharp or lasting pains). The target should be getting up to 100% whilst using the crutches for a minimum of 4 weeks but a maximum of 6 weeks; after this time, at the latest, I should be walking unaided in the shoe.

This was certainly good news for my hands – they were in pain due to supporting 100% of my weight for about 50% of my walking time (I had no instructions to remain bed-ridden and had zero desire nor saw any reason to do so); this pain had actually become, very quickly, my biggest immediate problem, leading to motor problems in my right hand (using a mouse / typing related to my index and middle fingers); in addition, walking with crutches suddenly became much easier and more stabile with me now ‘feathering’ my toes of the injured foot on the ground.

Later at home I went through the MRI pics on my laptop: below, red is the tear, orange is a somewhat damaged section … unlikely to have happened at the same time, I was told; possibly tendinopathy from the past … which led to some speculation that the tear might have occurred due to previous damage. Initially, though, either way: torn is torn!

Tips to make “Day Three” and beyond safer and more manageable

?: ?

?: ?

:

The next shopping list – ?

< I’m going to come back and do a better job on the collation of prioritised lists later, but for the moment, have a look at this ‘gear’ page I wrote early on > … it’s not great, not complete, and there are some more lists on Reddit, but perhaps better than nothing.

Assorted links …

R

My top three links for those non-researchers amongst us

Whilst you could spend a lifetime just trying to go through all available resources on this topic, you’d never manage it: there are new studies being published all the time, new opinions being formed, people trying to pull you in one or the other direction (surgeons earn money by performing operations, others may have different ulterior motives).

  • ?
  • ?
  • ?
A selection of Reddit threads

Redditors on many threads are out for entertainment, to gather ‘karma’ and ‘awards’, or to rage-bait others as a means to pass the time. The same cannot be said for those on the r/AchillesRupture sub. Nevertheless, there are thousands of posts, 100s of thousands of comments and a lot of the good stuff simply ‘goes under’, perhaps never to be found again. This list here attempts to be a parking place for as many of the really good threads I could find:

  • ?
  • ?

.

YouTube interviews and posts

Same as yesterday: YouTube has endless Achilles resources, some good, some not so – many will be trying to sell you something or simply attract your attention, gather your ‘likes’. This collated list attempts to weed those out and just give you ‘the good stuff’:

  • ?
  • ?
A selection of ‘white papers’ (scientific studies) and other internet links

.

That was ‘Day Three’ … what’s next?

F.

< BTW: I’m currently restructuring these pages – next post is ‘week one’ with a bit of an overlap >


Future-Sol’s reflections (notes from Jan 11th)

P.

< just injured your Achilles tendon? / urgent short-term resources / resources for later on >

< who am I? / my journal ‘mission statement’ >

Leave a comment